Notices by Xerz 💗 [UNMOVED] (espectalll@mstdn.io), page 123

So kids, what did we learn today?

👉 Being me (a furry pro-LGBTI+ libertarian weeb who thinks and talks too much) is hard. Just sometimes. Not bragging here, really! 👀
👉 Not 100% of people are actually willing to talk or listen, they may only want to impose their ideas or just be #leTriggered instead. While you'll still find people who can learn, at the moment or eventually.
👉 Nazis in the fediverse are a real thing - beware!
👉 There's hope and love to be had, after all :nombread:

@ayy @shit @Dolus @anjum @nepfag Keep in mind most of the scientific work is done on the open and is exposed to criticism.

@ayy @shit @Dolus @anjum @nepfag Except there's too many scientists worldwide, and one's conflict of interest may oppose to other scientist's somewhere else. Or you can just have independent people, professional scientists or not, looking at it.

@7even OK, that's the one I found by reverse-searching, will add it to my (infinite-length) MAL list :nombread:

@ayy @nepfag @anjum @Dolus @shit In this case, you can verify on your own if studies exist, where they come from, and how accepted they are.

@ayy @nepfag @anjum @Dolus @shit Please explain so - of course some lies on health can be accepted and perpetuated (e.g. George McGovern's pyramid, sugar) but they usually come from politicians and lobbyists, not from scientists and health companies.

@shit @nepfag @anjum @Dolus Of course. Dysphoria is in your head. Depression is in your head. Your conscience is in your head. Nothing about you exists.

@Dolus @anjum @nepfag this message isn't even replying to anything and it's not how it works either

@Dolus @anjum @nepfag I don't care which sexuality you consider yourself as or who did you vote, the influence is still there. Or are you going to tell me that you're a Sanders-loving liberal?

@noformnocontent @quad Because they disagree, of course. And they're replying now. And oh boy what a mess.

@Dolus @nepfag @anjum No, it's not, that's what your simplistic view of biology based on older knowledge and conservative biases makes you think of as "facts".

@Dolus @nepfag @anjum No, it's not, that's what your simplistic view of biology based on older knowledge and conservative biases is.

@Dolus @nepfag @anjum What's wrong with my statement? It's a case-by-case thing.

@Dolus @anjum @nepfag ...this is pointless and you won't get me to say "there's only two genders" lmao

@Dolus @anjum @nepfag I agree that they have them, some for being so, others for other reasons

@Dolus @nepfag @lain @anjum Correct IMHO

@Dolus @nepfag @anjum That male and female brains have distinct qualities? And that trans brains share of both?

@noformnocontent @quad ...but I wanted replies to have a decent debate, not popularity

@Dolus @anjum @lain @nepfag I don't really care what others say, no matter if they share ideas with me, if it's incorrect

@Dolus @anjum @nepfag Everyone's brains are different, and you'll find certain patterns that apply overall, on certain groups, that derive more as you find special cases, and so on