Notices by Xerz 💗 [UNMOVED] (espectalll@mstdn.io), page 40

@lain heil nya

@sn0w Loneliness Level: I don't even have Netflix to tell me that

@Sir_Boops WHY DO YOU KEEP STEALING MY PHOTOS SIR BOOPS

Offline stuff? 🆗
Profile options? 👌
Privacy options? :okfidget:
Web Push API?

@corbin I wish I didn't have to care about reviews, but lots of people seem to rely too much on those damn stars

Fun fact: every pleasing/entertaining/joyful thing gives you dopamine. Feeling nice is a drug, and that should stop. Start feeling not nice. It's more functional and productive.

You annoying youngsters just can't stop whining and being sensitive, kids these days don't know how life is anymore https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTXECRCQTno

@kb I can give you that one, but those are rather tools for... servers. That includes having TUI commands, creating abstractions over existing abstractions, and sharing resources. Which is pretty good... but I still don't see why it could be more competitive than Rust, other than for the moment.

@kb OK, I'm aware of all of that but dynamically linked C... which, from what I can tell, it's just an FFI bindgen like... well, rust-bindgen.

I don't see how you can do a systems language if you cannot compile something without a targetting a specific kernel, though. And Go has proven to be good at having pretty decent performance and concurrency, but not anything else. Doesn't have an ecosystem for GUIs, neither it seems to me that it has any competitive advantages for anything but servers

@kb Why wouldn't it have the option to do dynamic linking? With that and having mandatory GC, I don't really see the point for Go other than as a language for small servers

Also, there's no default target on Rust but the one your OS or Rustup assigns it. Neither fully static nor static without the libc (e.g. with glibc) or dynamic (which is *never* the default on any target).

Nice article thingie for starters who are struggling with their studies https://l1cafe.github.io/productivity/

@kb How is it any different from Rust? Please explain, because I don't see any difference. In particular, Rust already comes with Musl targets where you can statically compile binaries including the libc. I've never tried tho so maybe I'm wrong?

@Sir_Boops y you so mean :crying:

@Sir_Boops hey I told you to not steal my photos you bad boops

@kb @vaartis Aren't both languages capable of that? Definitely better than a regular runtime tho