Even on a very small static website #Cloudflare makes a difference. #Security #InfoSec
Conversation
Notices
-
Ain Tohvri (tekkie@mstdn.social)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Jun-2023 10:02:00 UTC Ain Tohvri -
Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 (rysiek@mstdn.social)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Jun-2023 10:01:42 UTC Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 @tekkie @digitalRightsNinja I mean, Wikipedia does not block Tor. If you use Tor you don't get to *edit* Wikipedia anonymously, but you *can* read it and you *can* register / log-in and edit then.
CloudFlare is exploiting and supercharging the "oooooh scaary darkweeeeb 👻" narrative for profit, and to push more people into their centralized service. They already handle ~20% of all web traffic globally.
https://w3techs.com/technologies/details/cn-cloudflareI would argue CloudFlare centralization is a bigger threat than Tor.
-
Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 (rysiek@mstdn.social)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Jun-2023 10:01:43 UTC Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 @tekkie @digitalRightsNinja scoring by whom, for what purpose?
Why do I care if a Tor node is "red" in that sense if my site is static and there's not much to abuse? What kind of "events" did CloudFlare "mitigate" for you on a static site that would not be mitigated by the fact that the site is static?
After doing some serious web hosting work, I really doubt that blocking Tor makes a difference, unless we're talking dynamic websites that allow anonymous interactions.
admin de gnusocial.net repeated this. -
Ain Tohvri (tekkie@mstdn.social)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Jun-2023 10:01:50 UTC Ain Tohvri @digitalRightsNinja @rysiek unfortunately Tor nodes are traditionally blocked because there's a lot malicious action originating from them. The entire ranges for those Tor nodes are often completely red when it comes to abuse scoring.
-
digitalrightsninja@fedi.at's status on Wednesday, 14-Jun-2023 10:01:59 UTC digitalRightsNinja @rysiek
Indeed. For example, #Cloudflare considers Tor users like myself to be malicious. So my legit access to the above mentioned website would have blocked me and incremented that count that users sadly believe are true positives for malicious attempts. -
Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 (rysiek@mstdn.social)'s status on Wednesday, 14-Jun-2023 10:02:00 UTC Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦 @tekkie yeah, a bunch of people will avoid it. Plus, there is no info what #CloudFlare considers an "event" and why it needed "mitigation". And if it's a small site, presumably going static would be feasible, which would remove a gigantic amount of attack surface, without putting a spying gatekeeper between the site and its visitors.
-