@lcruggeri I'd like to see some benchmarks first. If it performs like ext4 while offering the advanced features of btrfs and zfs, I would consider switching my root partition to it.
It will take some time before mainstream Linux distros will start offering bcachefs as an installation option, let alone make it the default.
@codewiz it's an idea of mine that it would be the successor of the ext filesystems, maybe it's the time of the night that's making me say weird stuff, kinda anxious now can't sleep
@globalc@benoit If I were Red Hat, I also wouldn't want to explain to my paying customers how to recover an unbootable system when btrfs becomes "imbalanced".
@benoit@codewiz It's clearer if you distinguish: Fedora is heavily (full?) community driven, and has decided to do btrfs by default for Workstation. Fedora Server is still XFS, I think. For RHEL, the decision is rather what feels enterprise ready (stability, features, knowledge level of the employees - much plays in).
I think the fact btrfs made it into Workstation as default shows how much community driven it is.
@codewiz We had an info session some month ago, and it was taken in good spirit by our teams. Now next is to have stuff in upstream, and see how heavily it gets used by people, and how many issues get reported.
When I installed Asahi remix on the work provided Macbook pro recently, that also was my first contact with btrfs. For Fedora server, XFS stays default at the moment.
@globalc@codewiz@benoit That is how I use btrfs on the family laptops (Fedora and Arch). Btrfs on top of luks and snapper for automatic snapshots. No RAID. I stick to xfs and cephfs on the family servers.
@codewiz@benoit Yes, I think also others offering support just stick to the basics, no encryption/raid/compression. Using the snapshots to jumping back and forth after upgrades could be nice though - error prone to do with LVM snapshots and i.e. XFS ontop.