Two: A community's normative expectations need to be taken into account, for example, that posts are only easily visible to a certain subsection of the fediverse. These expectations may (and often are) completely disconnected from the technical capabilities of the service (e.g. that posts are publicly available), and that's okay. We encounter these expectations of behaviour despite capabilities for different behaviour all the time in the real world. Social contracts regulate them.
Conversation
Notices
-
Prof. Catherine Flick (catherineflick@mastodon.me.uk)'s status on Thursday, 15-Feb-2024 05:58:06 UTC Prof. Catherine Flick -
Prof. Catherine Flick (catherineflick@mastodon.me.uk)'s status on Thursday, 15-Feb-2024 05:58:07 UTC Prof. Catherine Flick As someone who did her PhD on consent I just want to flag a few things in the bsky bridge discussion. One: medical style disclosure based consent (terms and conditions, EULAs etc.) is totally inappropriate for this sort of situation and has been for decades. But it serves the needs of slow-moving legal requirements and companies that like people to forget they signed up to stuff (or were coerced into doing so for social or other reasons). See https://liedra.net/thesis for more details. (1/n)
f repeated this.
-