Conversation

Notices

1. Alcario Tuzon - Clownprophet (zemichi@gs.smuglo.li)'s status on Monday, 17-Apr-2017 14:27:13 UTC Alcario Tuzon - Clownprophet

   • nepfag
   • あや
   @hatsuki @nepfag https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/2679152
   https://mastodon.social/users/Gargron/updates/1873222
   https://pawoo.net/@pixiv/294585
   
   Telling another instance that their content is "culturally unacceptable" and that they should change it does not represent free speech values at all.
   
   In my position it sounds like he could be bullying admins to follow his rules and make the fediverse follow his values.
   
   I know there's legal issues but the word choice makes it sound like Gargron is trying to do something else.
   • 御園はくい repeated this.
   • nepfag (nepfag@gs.smuglo.li)'s status on Monday, 17-Apr-2017 14:29:09 UTC nepfag

     • あや
     @hatsuki He really doesn't. He spent the 6 months before his stuff blew up begging our (As in, GNU/Social) people for help and as soon as he gets some blog posts written about himself we're evil nazies who must be blocked.
     
     Gargamel has never operated in good faith for all his life.
     御園はくい repeated this.
   • Alcario Tuzon - Clownprophet (zemichi@gs.smuglo.li)'s status on Monday, 17-Apr-2017 14:51:19 UTC Alcario Tuzon - Clownprophet

     • あや
     @hatsuki Why ask if pixiv will moderate their loli content or not?
     Who exactly would benefit if pixiv did moderate loli content?
     
     The instance he runs of course.  Along with other instances that support the same political opinion
     
     This is why I believe it's a control move.
     御園はくい repeated this.