Conversation
Notices
-
when people get split on the morality of sex in society, there's some major differences in world views and understanding certain things
on one hand you have people who believe it's mostly just a recreational activity, a way to have fun as a human, maybe have kids if you feel like it, anything else is just conservatives being authoritarian or fundies being crazy
then you have people who understand that you need children to keep your civilization alive, who understand the primary purpose of sex is to procreate, who understand that promiscuity has psychological impact on people that affects their capability for commitment, who understand that you need stable households to raise those children in (state mandated education isn't good enough, single mothers aren't good enough) https://shitposter.club/attachment/666772
- 御園はくい likes this.
- 御園はくい repeated this.
-
@8zu @shpuld ah, another eugenics proponent! hii
-
@8zu @augustus @shpuld i suspect not every race has a predisposition to bureaucracy and submitting to central governments like the chinese though. how are you going to enforce that then
-
@shpuld @augustus @8zu theoretically a central government with noblesse oblige would work
"theoretically" because the time for noblesse oblige has passed and it's never coming back at the current state of things ;____;
-
@augustus @shpuld @8zu are you CIA now
-
@shpuld @augustus @8zu ideally at the mayorial level the community is self-sufficient and local leaders have the community's interests first, instead of lining their own pockets or trying to climb up the ladder
at the state level it's just coordinating each community, resolving disputes, national defense, etc. no micromanaging; those are left to the communities themselves. also a focus on just sustaining the community, away from "economic growth" would alleviate some of the exploitation
but once again, that train has left the station