Bobinas P4G
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 08-Aug-2017 22:29:52 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
    @dt extreme wealth and income inequality is a systemic output of corporatist systems, and you are defending the former. If the cap fits..
    In conversation Tuesday, 08-Aug-2017 22:29:52 UTC from quitter.se permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 10-Aug-2017 10:37:10 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt how?
      In conversation Thursday, 10-Aug-2017 10:37:10 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 13-Aug-2017 02:27:48 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt hypothetically, sure. Is that how the inequality of both income *and* wealth have grown across the anglophone world since the 1980s?
      In conversation Sunday, 13-Aug-2017 02:27:48 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 20-Aug-2017 06:13:46 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt wow, your ideological simulation of the world covers everything... but at no point does it make contact with evidence without crashing
      In conversation Sunday, 20-Aug-2017 06:13:46 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 20-Aug-2017 06:16:05 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt I used to live in an anarchist bubble and squat the moral high ground too (sometimes still do). You can't change anything real in there
      In conversation Sunday, 20-Aug-2017 06:16:05 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 20-Aug-2017 06:18:22 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt reality is messier than any model can fully describe, and to be useful, political theory has to be changed to fit reality not vice-versa
      In conversation Sunday, 20-Aug-2017 06:18:22 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 21-Aug-2017 04:01:44 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt this comment is a restatement of your ideology as proof of the correctness of your ideology. This is *exactly* what I'm talking about
      In conversation Monday, 21-Aug-2017 04:01:44 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:22:19 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt "obviously true" = ideological belief. Nothing is obviously true. Some things are supported better by evidence than others
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:22:19 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:23:31 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt claims made without reference to real world evidence are meaningless statements of belief; ideology
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:23:31 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:24:58 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt an example, real world evidence shows the US spends more on health care per capita than many countries with better health outcomes
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:24:58 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:25:23 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt all of which have a public health system ("single-payer" in US-speak)
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:25:23 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:30:18 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt countries like mine (NZ) which had fully funded public health and moved towards commercialization have declining health outcomes
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:30:18 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:30:30 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      • Jonne Arjoranta
      @jaranta @dt a handful of eccentric characters in the larger cities, or large populations of them like in the US?
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:30:30 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:32:00 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt so however inconvenient it might be to my anarchist beliefs, the evidence shows that integrated, not-for-profit health systems work best
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:32:00 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:32:47 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt in the face of this evidence I can a) deny it b) seek counter-evidence or c) looks for ways to do "single-payer" health without states
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:32:47 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:34:42 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt sorry for the fragmented rant, but it's hard to put forward a position on stuff like this in 140 characters. Please respond to the whole
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:34:42 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:35:20 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt ...argument, rather than taking potshots at de-contextualized bits of it
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:35:20 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:59:51 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt it seems you opted for option a), and any evidence I present will be similarly denied. Not much point continuing the discussion is there
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 10:59:51 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:01:16 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      • Jonne Arjoranta
      @jaranta ok. Has the rate of homelessness been declining, roughly stable, or growing (as it is in the US and in my country)?
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:01:16 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:03:51 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt true, but the fact you've failed to see the copious evidence that supports my claim is your failing not mine. Try:
      http://qttr.at/1xji
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:03:51 UTC permalink

      Attachments


    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:05:10 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt or:
      http://qttr.at/1xjj
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:05:10 UTC permalink

      Attachments


    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:06:31 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt or:
      http://qttr.at/1xjk
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:06:31 UTC permalink

      Attachments


    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:12:46 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt based on what I've seen so far I expect you to religiously defend your chosen ideology regardless of the evidence. Surprise me
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:12:46 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:13:44 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt explain your vision for health provision and how it fits with real world evidence. Honestly, I'm all ears
      In conversation Thursday, 31-Aug-2017 11:13:44 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 12:54:48 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt once again, calling it "hyperregulated" fits your ideology. Any health system in a country with a state would fit that characterization
      In conversation Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 12:54:48 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 12:56:59 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt what those studies contrast is for-profit system vs. not-for-profit, and the for-profit system fails on almost every measure.
      In conversation Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 12:56:59 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 12:58:27 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt worth noting too that the government-managed health systems were studied at a time when they'd been purposefully run down by neoliberals
      In conversation Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 12:58:27 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 13:09:45 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt ok, let's test that theory. Ask me a question about the US healthcare system
      In conversation Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 13:09:45 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 13:10:43 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt I'd counter that you seem to know very little about any kind of health system except the one in your Snow Crash fantasies
      In conversation Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 13:10:43 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 13:11:32 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt do you know a single person who works in the health system? I have friends who are nurses (general and pysch), social workers etc
      In conversation Sunday, 03-Sep-2017 13:11:32 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 12:05:17 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt Obamacare gives corporate welfare to corporate health insurers while forcing them to give coverage to poor people. How's that?
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 12:05:17 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 12:06:01 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt it's the health equivalent of the bank bailouts. Give more money to corporations, and naively assume that will "trickle down"
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 12:06:01 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 12:07:00 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt the same money, used to fund not-for-profit hospitals and especially primary health clinics, would supply many times more care per $
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 12:07:00 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 12:12:53 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt that's what a "single-payer" health system means to me. No corporate welfare, but businesses are still free to offer health services
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 12:12:53 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 12:16:04 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt my turn. Describe in less than 500 chars how the Canadian health system works *and* how its health outcomes compare to those in the US
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 12:16:04 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:02:08 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt you can only give on fact "It's completely owned by the state" and it's wrong *sigh*
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:02:08 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:06:29 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt this says that public hospitals are under the control of regional government, not the federal state. No law against private hospitals
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:06:29 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:08:16 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt in Candana , as in many countries (eg UK), public health systems have been chronically underfunded to create a market for private care
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:08:16 UTC permalink
      ghostDancer likes this.
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:09:05 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt yes *still* produce significantly better health outcomes than in countries with a mostly for-profit health care system (eg US)
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:09:05 UTC permalink
      ghostDancer likes this.
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:10:33 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt you can't argue that for-profit system deliver better health care based on evidence, so you just say you "don't care"? How convincing...
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:10:33 UTC permalink
    • ghostDancer (ghostdancer@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:19:58 UTC ghostDancer ghostDancer
      in reply to
      @strypey @dt In Spain the the government is been sabotaging the public health system for years, underfunding it and it says it doesn't work
      In conversation Tuesday, 05-Sep-2017 14:19:58 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:01:21 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt this is an all-or-nothing fallacy. Fire is good for many things, but I wouldn't use it to perform surgery
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:01:21 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:02:25 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt User pays fundamentally fails in health care, because the better a job a healer does, the less repeat custom they get
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:02:25 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:03:42 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt the most profitable health care business is one that keeps people alive but chronically sick, requiring as much treatment as possible
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:03:42 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:10:06 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt I gave you peer-reviewed journal articles as evidence, you give me a ream of propaganda from one clearly biased think tank?
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:10:06 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:12:47 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt you really going to let someone paid by the Koch Brothers tell you what to think and ignore independent research?!?
      http://qttr.at/1xr0
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:12:47 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:14:37 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt yes, I reject starting with what you want to believe and cherry-picking evidence to fit that belief. That's not any kind of science
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 04:14:37 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:30:04 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt there's no such thing as "solid theory". In science, theories change and expand in response to observed and experimental facts
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:30:04 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:31:14 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt you need *a* theory, yes, otherwise I agree you don't know what you are looking at. But a scientist is aware of confirmation bias
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:31:14 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:34:23 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt again, picking only the facts that fit the theory and discarding the rest is religion, not science of any kind
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:34:23 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:36:53 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      • vegos
      @veg05 @dt it takes time for studies to be checked and replicated, and for new information gleaned by them to spread
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:36:53 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:37:42 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt it's the method for science. Period.
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:37:42 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:38:22 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt My fiancee just got her Phd in Anthropology, a social science. It does not start with fixed theories and cherry-pick facts to fit them
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:38:22 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:39:13 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt it starts with ethnographic field work, and uses a range of theory from the existing literature to interpret the resulting data
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:39:13 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:39:59 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt what it does not do is look only for data that supports one school of theory, and ignore all other data. That's not any kind of science.
      In conversation Thursday, 07-Sep-2017 09:39:59 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:07:21 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt look, if you don't want to talk about reality you should have said.
      In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:07:21 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:09:47 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt of course your theoretical fantasy worlds can't be proved or disproved.
      In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:09:47 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:10:33 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt But show me a theoretical model of a hurricane that is itself windy and wet, or that can change a storm by changing the model.
      In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:10:33 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:16:05 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt kids living in cars is a reality in my country
      http://qttr.at/1xtr
      In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:16:05 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:17:58 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt whatever economic theory I might draw on to understand why, I cannot deny the evidence that kids are living in cars or I am talking shit
      In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:17:58 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:20:42 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt nor the evidence that kids didn't used to live in cars in this country, and it began after decades of privatization and benefit cuts
      In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:20:42 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:21:27 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt if I deny that "free market" rationalization for pro-corporate policy has made this problem, then failed to fix it, I am talking shit
      In conversation Saturday, 09-Sep-2017 10:21:27 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Sunday, 10-Sep-2017 05:51:26 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt which one describes Koch Brothers funded PR think tanks like Foundation for Economic Education?
      http://qttr.at/1xr0
      In conversation Sunday, 10-Sep-2017 05:51:26 UTC permalink

      Attachments


    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Sep-2017 03:00:03 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      • futureBoyfriend
      @deadsuperhero thanks, but I think I'm done. Nothing about the exchange convinces me I'm not talking to a bot reacting to keywords
      In conversation Tuesday, 12-Sep-2017 03:00:03 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Sep-2017 04:35:38 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt  right, so if your economic theory says 'people don't hit each other with fish', and I slap you with a salmon, is the theory wrong?
      In conversation Tuesday, 12-Sep-2017 04:35:38 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Tuesday, 12-Sep-2017 04:38:07 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt or is non-fish-aggression so self-evident and axiomatic that being blatantly contrary to observable reality doesn't matter?
      In conversation Tuesday, 12-Sep-2017 04:38:07 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 05:43:24 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt it's not a strawman, it's a thought experiment. Boy would I enjoy slapping some sense into you with a piscine implement though :P
      In conversation Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 05:43:24 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 07:12:16 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt I see you've neatly avoided all the hard questions asked of you in this discussion, giving trite non-answers, or changing the subject
      In conversation Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 07:12:16 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 07:13:06 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt falling back every time on a set of PR key messages you can't even properly explain or defend. You're probably right though...
      In conversation Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 07:13:06 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 07:14:38 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      in reply to
      @dt ... that you're ideologically immune to seeing sense, no matter how much time anyone put into explanations (slappings with seafood)
      In conversation Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 07:14:38 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 07:16:32 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt you know very well that this account doesn't have the power to do that here. Want to shift the discussion to #Diaspora or #Hubzilla?
      In conversation Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 07:16:32 UTC permalink
    • Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 07:36:27 UTC Danyl Strype Danyl Strype
      @dt well, I've learned another place to go if I want to know what the Koch Brothers want people to think, so thanks for that. Later
      In conversation Wednesday, 13-Sep-2017 07:36:27 UTC permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Bobinas P4G is a social network. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.1-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Bobinas P4G content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.