Conversation

Notices

1. தோட்டக்காரன்(gardener) (solariiknight@social.systemreboot.net)'s status on Thursday, 03-Aug-2017 05:10:43 UTC தோட்டக்காரன்(gardener)

   • LibrePlanet
   Apparently GPL is declared as a contract and not a license.
   https://social.systemreboot.net/url/63609
   Not sure what the legal implications are.
   • Megver83 (megver83@quitter.cl)'s status on Thursday, 03-Aug-2017 13:25:03 UTC Megver83

     in reply to
     @solariiknight smells like there is one or more than one people who want to invalidate the GPL. For me it sounds reasonable, the GPL has the Copyleft, so corporations are not able to change the licenses, and many governments are paid by these corporations, pitifully
   • தோட்டக்காரன்(gardener) (solariiknight@social.systemreboot.net)'s status on Friday, 04-Aug-2017 06:49:12 UTC தோட்டக்காரன்(gardener)

     in reply to

     • Megver83
     So, by invalidating GPL as a license, corporations can use GPL licensed code and convert them into proprietary code?
   • Megver83 (megver83@quitter.cl)'s status on Friday, 04-Aug-2017 13:05:01 UTC Megver83

     in reply to
     @solariiknight sure, because by not considering the license, it would be the same as proprietarizing unlicensed software