Conversation
Notices
-
Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 11-Nov-2017 05:33:23 UTC
Danyl Strype
@brennen yes, *decentralized* (centre-less network of communities), not distributed (network of atomized individuals).
http://qttr.at/1zvo-
Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Friday, 10-Nov-2017 05:23:31 UTC
Danyl Strype
Corporate stalinist Peter Thiel explains in a #WSJ essay why private monopolies are better than competing businesses
http://qttr.at/1ztm -
Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 11-Nov-2017 05:09:09 UTC
Danyl Strype
@brennen de nada :) It seems to fit. -
Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 11-Nov-2017 05:12:20 UTC
Danyl Strype
@brennen He twists good arguments for managing natural monopolies as democratic commons, into rationalizations for global corporate rule -
Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 11-Nov-2017 05:13:23 UTC
Danyl Strype
@brennen ... if we search and social network really are natural monopolies, as he argues, they must be democracies, not private empires -
Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 11-Nov-2017 05:17:13 UTC
Danyl Strype
@brennen oops *web* search. I think he's wrong anyway, web search and social network can and should be decentralized, restoring competition -
Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 11-Nov-2017 05:36:03 UTC
Danyl Strype
@brennen I like the idea of horizontal networks replacing states, corporates, and other mega-hierarchies, but *not* replacing communities -
Danyl Strype (strypey@quitter.se)'s status on Saturday, 11-Nov-2017 05:38:02 UTC
Danyl Strype
@brennen ironically, #FarceBook have created the appearance of a #P2P mesh of atomized individuals, on top of a totally centralized platform
-