Conversation
Notices
-
@siedge @joesmo cars don't kill people, drivers kill people ;P
-
@joesmo @siedge maybe the difference is that cars have legitimate uses other than killing? Guns... not so much.
-
@siedge @joesmo Your point is fair, but you do mean by self defence by ... killing someone with a gun (or threatening to), yes?
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge claiming that water pistols are guns, therefore guns aren't for killing, is a classic argument from edge cases.
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge these are still gun deaths and this only reinforces the point I made that killing is what guns are for
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge there are legitimate arguments against state monopoly on lethal force, but claiming guns are like cars is not one
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge you're redefining "gun" from the common understanding (tool that shoots bullets) to suit your argument; edge cases
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge "defence" is the justification for nukes. Nobody really has nukes for defence, but as an implied threat of murder
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge this is what I mean by "edge case". For the vast majority of guns, the usual use is shooting bullets
-
@joesmo @jeremiah @siedge legally speaking, you're correct, and I'm not making a1>1 correlation between nukes and guns.
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge Just pointing out that "defence" is an ideological construct. Bush claimed invading Afghanistan was "defence"
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge technically yes, but lead shot has the same effect as bullets. Again, edge case logic
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge we seem to have got lost in definitional hair-splitting
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge my original point was that ignoring the use case differences between guns and cars only weakens your argument
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge I don't live in the US, and I'm on the fence about state gun control, so I don't really have skin in the game here
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge fair point but I think the parallel cuts both ways. All state heavily regulate who can own or use cars etc
-
@siedge @jeremiah @joesmo also, civilians are allowed cars, but not tanks. There's a parallel with guns there too
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge again, this cuts both ways. Patent trolls have constitutional rights. We still want them limited for public good
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge again, this cuts both ways. Patent trolls have constitutional rights. We still want them limited for public good
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge I'm no constitutional scholar but I believe the 2nd amendment has some important qualifiers (well-ordered militia)
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge that's definitely important to acknowledge. Same with cars (mode of transport vs. car porn culture)
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge that video reminds me of an old movie ... http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088224/
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge my friend has an old De Lorean. I loved BTTF as a kid and I'm super jealous. Put an electric motor in and ...
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge electric De Lorean, just needs Mr Fusion ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RA6Lz-s9SE8
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge it blows my mind that 1980s pulp sci-fi (Knight Rider) has now become a reality
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge classic over-engineering. As with other crap #UX hopefully they'll get over the neophilia and work this stuff out
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge may be another care where #openhardware is needed? You checked out WikiSpeed.org?
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge yes! Seems we hang out around some similar water coolers ;)
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge another free code electric car project in my home country is #GreenStage
http://www.greenstage.co.nz/
-
@jeremiah @joesmo @siedge OMG I'd never heard of the #Schweeb! Amazing what can be hiding in your own backyard