Conversation

Notices

1. Raito (raito@bsdnode.xyz)'s status on Wednesday, 03-Aug-2016 19:34:27 UTC Raito

   • [Net Kitteh]
   @netkitteh I prefer zsh because features. sh for scripting. bash is GNU shit.
   • Omar likes this.
   • drymer #en proceso de migrar (drymervieja@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 04-Aug-2016 06:21:43 UTC drymer #en proceso de migrar

     in reply to
     @raito Why is shit?
   • Raito (raito@bsdnode.xyz)'s status on Thursday, 04-Aug-2016 06:40:31 UTC Raito

     in reply to

     • drymer #en proceso de migrar
     @drymer Lacks of features compared with zsh in interactive mode. Ok, maybe is not shit, I was rude, but isn't the better option.
   • drymer #en proceso de migrar (drymervieja@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 04-Aug-2016 06:54:15 UTC drymer #en proceso de migrar

     in reply to
     @raito Like which? I'm triying oh my zsh since you posted yesterday, but I haven't seen much that's not possible to do with bash.
   • drymer #en proceso de migrar (drymervieja@quitter.se)'s status on Thursday, 04-Aug-2016 06:56:13 UTC drymer #en proceso de migrar

     in reply to
     @raito Oh, I didn't read the interactive mode part. I don't know what it is, I'll have to search it.
   • Raito (raito@bsdnode.xyz)'s status on Thursday, 04-Aug-2016 15:46:40 UTC Raito

     in reply to

     • drymer #en proceso de migrar
     @drymer By interactive I mean use it as regular shell, not for scripting.
     My first advice is don't use oh my zsh, just configure your .zshrc by yourself. About the features, it has better completion for files and command args; better prompts; autocd, just write a path to cd, ".." for go the parent dir; better cd command, you can replace a part of path where you are; path expansion write just a part of path and press tab for get the full path, ie /u/lo/e[Tab] expands to /usr/local/etc; better aliases. Maybe there are other features that I don't use/ I haven't discovered.