Conversation
Notices
-
@simsa0 even if you have the right to remove it (i doubt it), i don't think that's fair on the other people who has contributed to it
-
gnusocial admins: don't let trump move your tolerance for frisbee seeking. nazis are still nazis – block, silence, delete.
-
@simsa0 i don't think you can do that. you wrote it collaboratively with others, and contributed it to the AGPLv3 licensed project !qvitter
-
@simsa0 i appreciate your work, but i can remove the credit/mention of you if you like.
-
@simsa0 it surprises me that you seem to have had no problem with the faq being used on slc, smuglio etc?
-
@simsa0 but i will of course remove it from the qvitter repo if someone i trust in license/copyright issues tell me i should
-
@mcscx2 i agree, we need a better more up to date faq. but i'm worried people will get mad/sad if we suddenly remove it without replacement
-
@mcscx2 it looks nice. i wish i had a higher work capacity now, so i could work on stuff like this.
-
@hannes2peer There are TOS on q.se (and many other nodes have the same) that prohibit racism, xenophobism, antisemitism etc. Accepting those terms on the one hand but trying to pull out own work if the service's admin is acting like stated in these TOS on the other hand is slightly ambivalent. To me this is a sulky reaction by @simsa0. Like the one kid who owns the ball taking it away when he's losing the soccer match.
-
@vinzv to be fair @simsa0 never liked the TOU (added 2 months after the FAQ). i understand the criticism, but i have different opinion.
-
@vinzv i think it has to do with what you think gnusocial _is_. is it a way of coding utopia? or is it more like organizing a struggle?
-
@vinzv i want it to be a little of both, which complicates things...
-
@hannes2peer Well, then it would have been logical to leave q.se and to move on to some other "free speech" (!sic) node.
-
@vinzv haha please start a !sic-group!
-
@hannes2peer @vinzv I'm not sure that !gnusocial would be the best system for organising. For that Hubzilla might be better because it has calendar/events plus privacy groups and additional encryption.
-
@bob i think you read organizing too literal here. i was referring to a pretty vague concept of how to think about quitter/gnusocial
-
@bob because yes, gnusocial sucks at organizing at the moment. the idea with qvitter is to make it easy to quit the sucky platforms, by >
-
@hannes2peer Same to me. It feels to me like a long term on going project, especially looking back on how it changed (merely: evolved) over the years.
-
@bob > also being pretty aweful. when/if lots of people quit, hopefully the network will turn into someting more useful. which is likely >
-
@bob > because federation and free software makes the power structures radically more democratic than a corporation.
Hannes
vinzv
Bob Mottram
All Bobinas P4G content and data are available under the