Wired editor Chris Anderson wrote a book asking how one can compete with "free"? Let's reframe the question. How do we compete with free *and* amoral? How about by doing cheap and ethical? How about by replacing trustless, dehumanizing "platforms" with a return to human-scale organizations based on bulding trust?
Conversation
Notices
-
Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Friday, 16-Nov-2018 07:47:28 UTC Strypey - Adonay Felipe Nogueira repeated this.
-
Strypey (strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz)'s status on Friday, 16-Nov-2018 07:55:32 UTC Strypey It's been estimated that FarceBook's current revenue could be replaced by charging each user US$5-10 a month.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2018/04/05/what-if-we-paid-for-facebook-instead-of-letting-it-spy-on-us-for-free/But I suspect that what FB costs to operate and even make a modest surplus is much less than that. One question that intrigues me is this; would a FB-a-like cost more in less to operate, in aggregate, if we replaced it with a federated platform?
Adonay Felipe Nogueira repeated this.