@strypey #CreativeCommons licenses are auto-upgradable, and there is currently no way to remove it from the original work (if you are the original author/proprietor). The catch is that the free/libre license variations ("CC-BY"-and-any-number-or-jurisdiction and "CC-BY-SA"-and-any-number-or-jurisdiction) cannot work well enough to address the suset of public goods (in economical categorization, not to be confused with "owned by government") that are functional works.
Conversation
Notices
-
Adonay Felipe Nogueira (adfeno@ecodigital.social)'s status on Thursday, 29-Nov-2018 11:45:38 UTC Adonay Felipe Nogueira -
Adonay Felipe Nogueira (adfeno@ecodigital.social)'s status on Thursday, 29-Nov-2018 12:07:12 UTC Adonay Felipe Nogueira @strypey for this subset, strong #copyleft is advised, as recommended in https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html , and by same reference, when incorporating a work under CC-BY-SA-4.0 (valid only for this version number so far) into a #AGPL or #GPL the license version of the resulting work must be "3.0-only" and set #CreativeCommons as proxy to allow [A]GPL upgrade, pointing to their compatibility review page in the additional text that must accompany the " #copyright + license" notice.
-