Bobinas P4G
  • Login
  • Public

    • Public
    • Groups
    • Popular
    • People

Conversation

Notices

  1. AndStatus (andstatus@loadaverage.org)'s status on Thursday, 14-Feb-2019 05:40:18 UTC AndStatus AndStatus
    • Juanjo Faico
    Discussion of the #ActivityPub Note's "name" property usage and it's processing by Pleroma. Main attention is on the Client to Server interactions that are being implemented in #AndStatus.

    I feel that we mixing two different use cases here:

    1. An ActivityPub property, to which a Note's Subject/Title is placed, when entered via Pleroma web UI.
    I understood about this point.

    2. Delivery / sending to other servers a Note, which came from a client application or from another server and which has the "name" property.
    I assume that if incoming Note has the "name" property, Pleroma doesn't delete that property, but sends it to recipients with the same value.
    ?!

    https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/issues/635
    In conversation Thursday, 14-Feb-2019 05:40:18 UTC from loadaverage.org permalink
    • Colegota El Villano likes this.
    • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: (lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me)'s status on Thursday, 14-Feb-2019 05:47:38 UTC Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell: Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
      in reply to
      • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
      @andstatus Pleroma/Mastodon WebUI is using the summary field, name has just no place at all in the REST APIs nor in the current world of the fediverse.
      And even in a bit different world: Friendica posts with a title are Articles, without they are Notes.
      In conversation Thursday, 14-Feb-2019 05:47:38 UTC permalink
      AndStatus repeated this.
    • AndStatus (andstatus@loadaverage.org)'s status on Thursday, 14-Feb-2019 06:15:38 UTC AndStatus AndStatus
      in reply to
      • Juanjo Faico
      • Haelwenn /элвэн/ :triskell:
      @lanodan It's OK for #Mastodon and #Pleroma to use in their UI "summary" property only. Especially taking into account that Mastodon actually doesn't have Title/Subject of a "toot" but "CW" only (Content Warning) that fits into semantics of #ActivityPub's "summary" better than into "name".
      Above decision shouldn't influence the "name" property, one of basic properties of #ActivityPub vocabulary.

      Regarding current usage: Pump.io uses both "name" and "summary" properties since its creation in 2013, and they live together without problems.
      In conversation Thursday, 14-Feb-2019 06:15:38 UTC permalink

Feeds

  • Activity Streams
  • RSS 2.0
  • Atom
  • Help
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Privacy
  • Source
  • Version
  • Contact

Bobinas P4G is a social network. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.1-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.

Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 All Bobinas P4G content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.