π Dr. Freemo :jpf: π³π±@ae Fact remains Not voting is not voting against party lines first off, so stop trying to stretch what little numbers you can, thats not helping you look objective here.
Second you can spin it however you want, you wont convince me that when 99%+ of a party is voting party lines that they are unbias.
Next "statistically significant" just means "unlikely to be random".. So all your saying is that the marginal and insufficient less than 1% difference is probably not just random error.. I mean ok.. they still have 0 credibility if all they have is a marginally insignificant 2 people voting no..
That said we are still about 4 levels deep into meta arguments on this that largely miss the main point anyway.
All Bobinas P4G content and data are available under the