@globalc Imagine future where we have advanced as civilisation to gather energy direclty from stars ... just to continue with this crypto shitshow. In that scenario I consider our civilization to be an epic failure.
@bhart The point I was trying to make was that the amount of energy used is the wrong metric.
A solar panel can generate energy with no emissions, and you could use that energy to mine crypto or to to drive around in a cybertruck.
So I'm not nit-picking to distract from the message; I'm pointing out that the message in question (*) is an attempt to mislead the public by someone with a political agenda.
(*) "Bitcoin singlehandedly undid ALL the environmental good of electric vehicles in 2021"
@codewiz is this a good-faith nitpick or an attempt to derail and distract from the message?
For those reading along: each electric vehicle "produces" some amount less emissions than a combustion vehicle. Take all those "savings" combined. The electricity used for bitcoin causes more emissions than that value.
It is *not* an argument for EVs. Simply a comparison. In fact, it could be used as a pretty good argument that EVs are not a sufficient solution.
@bhart To be 100% clear: I'm not saying that Bitcoin miners are using 100% renewable energy.
Mining *is* very bad and wasteful, but the comparison to EVs is trying to make it look worse than wasting electricity for other reasons. And this is what triggered my bullshit detector.