@patrick @codewiz @nanook Okay, i was reading that court decision differently.
For reference (in German):
https://rewis.io/urteile/urteil/lhm-20-01-2022-3-o-1749320/
Will try to understand this in more depth. However, if this isn't just talking about Google Fonts / website owner versus visitor, than the aforementioned remark, that this puts any transfer of ip into log files of 3rd parties into the focus, sounds like heaviwe depths to come. Technically this already happens with any referrer URL in anybody's logs, no?