Conversation

Notices

1. imgn (imgn@mastodon.social)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Mar-2022 18:16:02 UTC imgn

   • Funkwhale

   RIP #BandCamp (maybe) https://blog.bandcamp.com/2022/03/02/bandcamp-is-joining-epic/

   Now is a good time to invest in @funkwhale

   • Tagomago repeated this.
   • Chris Were 🐧 (chriswere@linuxrocks.online)'s status on Wednesday, 02-Mar-2022 18:16:02 UTC Chris Were 🐧

     in reply to

     • Funkwhale

     @imgn @funkwhale

   • imgn (imgn@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Mar-2022 18:56:24 UTC imgn

     in reply to

     • PeerTube

     RIP #Vimeo (maybe) https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/15/22979126/vimeo-patreon-creators-price-increase

     Now is a good time to try @peertube

   • Tagomago (tagomago@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Mar-2022 19:03:01 UTC Tagomago

     in reply to

     @imgn Actually makes sense if your model is not based on selling ads. If you're exhausting a big chunk of resources, that has to be covered in some way. Not saying that the price tag is correct, idk... but. Any service would have troubles trying to cope with that, even PeerTube p2p model, I presume. Would be interesting to watch a stress test like that on PeerTube. Video is expensive.

     aab likes this.
   • imgn (imgn@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Mar-2022 21:00:36 UTC imgn

     in reply to

     • Tagomago

     @tagomago Yes, I had the same thought. But I think the issue here is that many creators had their videos removed before they could respond to the sudden and steep price hike. It's just another reminder that these sites control your content and viewership. Small federated instances could help with this problem.

   • Tagomago (tagomago@mastodon.social)'s status on Tuesday, 15-Mar-2022 21:04:41 UTC Tagomago

     in reply to

     @imgn Yes, that part sucks and it is unacceptable.