Chris Trottier
Fediverse has flaws, big flaws.
Example: basing any decentralization of the Internet on a centralized structure like DNS is problematic.
Yet, I'm going all in on the Fediverse. Here's why. https://blog.peerverse.space/why-im-all-in-with-the-fediverse-even-though-i-have-gripes/
Chris Trottier
The Fediverse is not the best solution for decentralization. Yet, it is still a solution. More importantly, it's a solution that actually has momentum.
So I'm all in.
Chris Trottier
Let me confess something. For the past 5 years, I've been working on technologies to decentralize the web. There's been progress. I think what I'm working on will be better than current Fediverse apps. But they're not ready yet.
Chris Trottier
The tech I'm building isn't ready. But what can we all use now? Mastodon, Matrix, Pleroma, Pixelfed, Peertube... I can go on.
Let's decentralize now instead of waiting for something better to come along in the future.
Chris Trottier
The Fediverse is a collection of messy, badly documented protocols.
But also: the Fediverse is actually decentralized and has momentum.
I have my gripes but acknowledge the Fediverse has big advantages.
Chris Trottier
I've spoken to other people who have recently joined the Fediverse. They report the same thing. The Fediverse may have a smaller userbase, but more interactions.
This means the Fediverse has something important: momentum.
Chris Trottier
Earlier this week, I wrote about how easy it was to build a network effect with a new Pixelfed instance. I'm experiencing interactions that rival when I had an Instagram account. Did I get lucky? Am I an edge case? https://blog.peerverse.space/my-pixelfed-instance-is-a-bigger-success-than-i-could-ever-have-predicted/
Chris Trottier
But also, let's consider this Mastodon (@atomicpoet) account and compare it to my Twitter profile.
On Twitter, I have 8,600+ followers. On Mastodon, a little over 300.
Yet, I get more interactions happening on Mastodon.
Chris Trottier
But what is decentralized and has a wide enough network effect? What collective protocol(s) have momentum?
The Fediverse!
Chris Trottier
Now let's consider SIP. I remember lots of clients back in the 2000s, but widespread use was little. Why? Because of Skype.
There's still hope for SIP via Jitsu, but most people use something like Zoom—and Zoom is centralized.
Chris Trottier
To sum up:
1. SMTP: popular but centralized
2. XMPP: Good, lacks network effect, used for building centralized apps
3. SIP: Good enough, has stuck around, might have a second Life
Either centralized or doesn't have a good network effect.
Chris Trottier
XMPP seems like a protocol companies use to build centralized messaging apps upon. Federated XMPP apps have comparatively little adoption.
Chris Trottier
Google dominates email. As of 2019, Gmail had 1.5 billion users. If Gmail were a social network, it would rival Facebook.
As far as decentralization is concerned, email is not in good health.
Chris Trottier
XMPP is probably the best messaging technology today—better than Matrix, Signal, and Telegram. This is why Google, Apple, etc. continue to build tech on top of XMPP.
But do you know anyone in your social circle that uses XMPP clients?
Chris Trottier
SMTP, XMPP, and SIP could be great standards to build a social network upon. I hope someone does it.
But where are they now?
Chris Trottier
Lots of folks are rediscovering the value of SMTP, especially as big corporations realize that newsletters outperform Facebook in terms of engagement. Good for email!
But just like social media, email has become centralized.
Chris Trottier
First, let's talk about alternatives to ActivityPub.
SMTP, XMPP, SIP—the Fediverse could have been built on these protocols. They've been battle-tested. They're well-documented. They work.
Bobinas P4G is a social network. It runs on GNU social, version 2.0.1-beta0, available under the GNU Affero General Public License.
All Bobinas P4G content and data are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license.