Notices by 🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org), page 114

@CCoinTradingIdeas
Im not by a co.puter which is the only reason i didnt show him the math yet. The relative mass is embeded in the variable p in his equation. So you just expand the p, get the relative mass element, then solve for it and see it is nonzero
@zeccano

@xyfdi
Its not too bad. A little cold but comfy if bundled up

Im on a Dutch bus, not surprised.

#utrecht #netherlands #holland

Im on a safari today in Utrecht spreading peace and hunting Dutch Snipe.

#selfie

Sometimes people think i dont take hints or an unempathic, truth is i just dont play fucking games. Be clear and direct with your emotions or gtfo.

@zeccano

please do, because you will quickly find the equation proves the exact opposite of what you claim, not to mention reality itself as we can all see.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

What, no thats not what the math showed at all.. please show me the steps you used to go from Dr. Lincolns equation to showing relativistic mass is equal to rest mass, because the equation you posted shows the exact opposit of what you just stated.

Show your math please, dont just state it to be so.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

Lets try this another way.

Tell me an experiment, either one that has been done or capable of being done, that demonstrates your assertion...

I'll wait. Because right now they all prove you wrong.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

Actually i take that back, you are correct that even in the original equation (Without the subscript 0) that the mass was specifically rest mass. Which is 0. The other term is the one that represents teh energy due to relatviistic mass, (which is contained within the p).

My apologies on that mistake.

Though your conclusion is still incorrect. Which as we covered has been experimentally proven (Something you like to just pretend doesnt exist in the conversations for some reason)

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

No you didnt

Still waiting for you to explain why all the experiments thousands of people around the world have all conducted disagree with every bit of nonsense you spout... I'll wait.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

those arent the same equations \( m_{0} \) is different than just m, that subscript of 0 is important.

No the 1 doesnt represent rest mass either.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

I told you the name of the experiment earlier, one which many have done and confirmed (myself included).

If you never bothered to actually test your incorrect theories, thats on you.

Dont blame others because you refuse to just "look and see" and would rather talk out of your ass endlessly and make assumptions.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

You can go away now.

It has relativistic mass, it does not have rest mass. You are unable and unwilling to learn what that distinction means

I would happily teach you if you were trying to learn, but you are not. In fact you are actively working to remain ignorant. y/ou have made no attempt to learn or correct any of your previous erroneous statements despite being proven wrong in multiple ways, not the least of which being experimentation.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

FYI, m in the equation you posted is not rest mass. Please learn about the equations you post before trying to talk about them.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

I have determined you are too mentally unstable to have a conversation that is of any benefit to you.

Until and unless you have a desired to learn how these things work (rather than disagreeing with observed objective facts) I will have to ask you to go away.

I will not feed your mental illness further, I will only help you learn if and when you are willing.

So until that time, good bye.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@binsrc It is more likely a meterote provided precursors for life (though self replicating potentially) than life itself. But who knows.

@zeccano

Reality/science: First you observe something, then you try your best to explain it. If your explanation doesnt agree with what is observed you conclude the theory is wrong.

What you do: Assume what you think to be true, then completely ignore what is observed. If the observations dont agree with your assumptions, you assume reality (what we observe) to be the lie.

That is delusion, not reality.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

You said that speed is motion. If that is the definition you want to use, then no speed/motion is not effected forward or sideways, the speed is always the same.

Only thing changing is the direction of the light, not ts speed/motion.

And again this is expermentally proven (and replicated by anyone who has bothered).

Remind me again what experiments you or anyone has ever conducted to confirm what you said? None, zero, yet plenty to contradict you.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

At this point it is looking more and more like a psychiatric issue to be honest.

That isnt meant to attack, but you keep ignoring the things that easily dispute you (actual reality we see with our eyes through experiments) vs what you want to be true. Even when you admit you dont even know basic maths. That is the defining quality of delusion.

I seriously hope you can realize this (and why i am investing effort) and you can rise above it one day or seek professional help. It isnt healthy for you.

@CCoinTradingIdeas

@zeccano

This is the problem with you not understanding basics, you dont even understand the words your reading..

The **speed** of light is a constant, no speed is not the same as meaning "motion", motion is a non technical word but in the way you are using it you are trying to imply the **direction** light travels is invarianet, that is not the case.

And yes light is effected in the forward direction, it is just that its **speed** isnt effected by it. Likewise light is effected int he sideway direction, yet again its **speed** is not

Also the the millionth time, the experimental evidence directly contradicts all the nonsense your spouting.

Funny how you keep ignoring the experiments, experiments you can do and see for yourself, but keep relying on your own fauly interpritionation of something you dont seem to understand.

@CCoinTradingIdeas