Notices by 🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱 (freemo@qoto.org), page 55

So Gremlin Python ( Tinkerpop 3 ) does not have transaction support. So only way to get transaction like behavior is to make sure you do everything in a single database traversal.

Because I am writing an ORM / OGM model as my base that means I needed to implement something that looks like optimistic locking all my own (only works on immutable write-only graphs). Its a huge pain in the ass.

Anyway after half a day I finally figured out this is the traversal I need to resolve my optimistic lock when creating a single new node in the DB:

session.g.E().has('dirty',1).aggregate('x').fold().V().has('dirty',1).aggregate('x').choose(_.V().hasLabel('account').has("fingerprint", "DEADF00D").hasNot('dirty').count().is(0), __.select('x').unfold().properties('dirty').drop()).iterate()

#programming #coding #Tinkerpop #tinkerpop3 #graphdb #graphtheory #python #gremlin

So Gremlin Python ( Tinkerpop 3 ) doesnt have transaction support. So only way to get transaction like behavior is to make sure you do everything in a single database traversal.

Because I am writing an ORM / OGM model as my base that means I needed to implement something that looks like optimistic locking all my own (only works on immutable write-only graphs). Its a huge pain in the ass.

Anyway after half a day I finally figured out this is the traversal I need to resolve my optimistic lock when creating a single new node in the DB:

session.g.E().has('dirty',1).aggregate('x').fold().V().has('dirty',1).aggregate('x').choose(_.V().hasLabel('account').has("fingerprint", "DEADF00D").hasNot('dirty').count().is(0), __.select('x').unfold().properties('dirty').drop()).iterate()

@berkes In that example I'd agree, but does it cary over to other examples.. does it do maths, conversions, and translations inline like google does?

@Absinthe
Turns an analog input signal into a digital equivelant (same frequency but magnitude information is lost)
@radiofreqs @crunchy

@radiofreqs

Here ya go, one of my manhatten style circuits so you can see the way I do it :)

@crunchy

Is joinmastodon.org down or something. I go to the page and the listings are blank... Anyone kno whats up?

#mastoadmin

@joaopinheiro Good morning

@ae That shit looks dddaaannnnkkkk :)

@ae WEll several points.

First and this is fundemental, I dont think its as clear taht trump did something wrong as you suggest. In short he asked the ukranian president if there is any legitimate evidence that Biden committed crimes, he did not ask nor suggest that the ukrain fabricate these crimes in any way, only if evidence existed.

How is that "clearly" something he did wrong? While I do think he should have probably deferred that to someone else so it wouldnt have the drama associated with it, he also probably thought he was more likely to get cooperation coming from him as the president.

Considering he didnt ask anyone to fabricate or make up anything and was only asking for legitimate evidence of crime, I'm not sure what it is that he really did wrong in the first place.

Furthermore the democrats were unable to get even support with their own party. While not a single republican voted to support the impeachment several democrats voted against the impeachment and one even switched their affiliated party in in response shortly after the vote.

They knew they couldnt even get democrat support, they knew they sure as hell wouldnt get republican support, they knew from the begining they would never stand a chance of getting 2/3rds support. So why even waste our time, and now that they did they prevent it from going to the senate for fear they might loose? If that is the vote that is the vote, the house has no power nor right to control the senate case. IF their going to loose so be it at least then we see the impeachment for what it was, a three ring circus and a desperate attempt for the democrats to try to win the 2020 election when it wasnt looking very good for them at the time.

Me when someone compliments me....

@timorl

Well depends. The impeachment was on the grounds that when trump asked ukraine for any legitimate evidence that biden committed crimes or that ukraine was involved in manipulating the 2016 election, that he was abusing his power as president.

The hearing largely deals with if that happened or not.

The stance of the republicans is basically something along the lines of: Trump didnt ask for evidence to be fabricated, he only asked for legitimate evidence, if there is any.

So even if trump is found completely guilty of what he was accused of the republicans would still not find that impeachable offence. So what is there to be impartial about. None of what is in question is really the issue, the very accusation and charges are non-issues to them.

I'm not saying ia gree with them, but the issue is less to do with their impartiality, or lack there of, and more to do with the fact that even if found guilty they dont see what trump did as an offense.

@SecondJon

@SecondJon

No law that says he has to be impartial your right. But as I said that is largely irrelevant. The senate majority leader doesnt oversee the senate hearing anyway.

@timorl

@khird So the first part.. when you say "it didnt make much sense to me".. . depends on your goal. If your goal is to have a vote on the issue and come to a democratic conclusion then it makes a lot of sense. Winning shouldnt be your goal, arriving at truth should be. Seeing as they couldnt even get democrat support for the impeachment, let alone bipartisan support, their case would appear rather weak, and they know it.

As for the democrats winning presidency, I'm not so sure. Yes they came close to winning the last election, but that isnt really a measure of their chance of winning this one. Trumps Approval rating just before impeachment was above that of even Obama's. So knowing that it seems clear to me the impeachment was a desperate act to change that. Now that the they dropped the ball on the impeachment I dont think they did themselves any favors really.

I dunno it looks to me like the democrats are a sinking ship and just grasping at straws to win at this point. In the long run i think it will hur tthem more than help.

@SecondJon

There is no legal requirement that an impeachment be linked to any sort of a crime. They are ok as far as that aspect goes.

@timorl

@timorl The senate majority leader, however, isnt the one who would be in control of a Senate hearing. It is presided over by the Chief Justice not the Senate Majority leader.