@pschwede in the system im writing wrong person isnt related to collisions, it makes no logical sense as a question.
As for sending the same money twice, transactions are ordered so whichever one succeeds first goes through if there is limited funds to cover both. If a person owns enough fuds to cover both then both parties would be paid.
Remember this is a ground up redesign of the cryptocurrency paradigm that is so different many of these questions are non-questions.
@CCoinTradingIdeas Are you laughing at that because it ironic and makes Trump supporters look like idiots for believing the disinformation in that meme?
Or are you laughing because you think the meme is true?
I find the vast majority of twitter are just bots and fake personas posting, little more than advertising engine for the famous.
The actual people on the platform just want followers and really dont care abut much else, if that. So virtually everythingin twitter is noise and the quality of the posts are shit.
But I find the quality of the posts int witter to be shit only because they are low quality posts, not because of any inherent antagonism.
Here I find the immature and antagonistic nature much more prevalent, but the noise far less. But i suppose thats the consequence when you have more actual people posting who have an interest in conversation and not just a wall of ads.
@pschwede The number of remembered transactionsa re irrelevant. Strictly speaking it doesnt have to remember any of them once a transaction is completed.
In things like bitcoin transactiosn never truly complete so such an idea would be nonsense. But this deseign is very different.
@pschwede well it can remember previous transactions, but it also has the option to forget them.
A server may wish to keep the complete trail to the begining of time for auditing reasons, so i suspect many will still opt to do this. It simply isnt needed for the ledger to work or be secured.
I;m not sure i understand the question. What do you mean "contained transactions" or "how many does one need"
@pschwede No in fact space is improved upon as well. In my system you can have a partial ledger (not containing every transaction until the beginning of time) and still have a secure system with the same guarantees as a full node.
@pschwede No it would scale at a logarithmic time complexity. Which is still very low carbon footprint at any scale relative to the network it can support.
Ok. I think the problem is we are evaluating different aspects.
Here if someone posts an unpopular opinion on the network you will usually get quite a few attacks and butt hurt people calling for a ban on you or your server if you have 1000+ followers.
On twitter you post such a thing and the response is usually silence, maybe a like or two, no real drama.
At least that is the expiernce ive had between the two in the past.
@pschwede No thats why i said "sorta". It wasts little to no computation time on working out hashes though. So it has a near-zero carbon footprint basically
Jeffrey Phillips FreemanInnovator & Entrepreneur in Machine Learning, Evolutionary Computing & Big Data. Avid SCUBA diver, Open-source developer, HAM radio operator, astrophotographer, and anything nerdy.Born and raised in Philadelphia, PA, USA, currently living in Utrecht, Netherlands.Pronouns: Sir / Mister(Above pronouns are not intended to mock, i will respect any persons pronouns and only wish pronouns to show respect be used with me as well)A proud member of the Penobscot Native American tribe, as well as a Mayflower passenger descendant. I sometimes post about my genealogical history.GPG/PGP Fingerprint: 8B23 64CD 2403 6DCB 7531 01D0 052D DA8E 0506 CBCE