Notices by Xerz 💗 [UNMOVED] (espectalll@mstdn.io), page 114

@vaartis https://wiki.gnome.org/Hackfests/Rust2018

wtf I've just realized I'm sitting right next to GNOME's co-founder

@angristan :blobtoofast:

@vaartis I think the intent is to say "in a literal sense"

@vaartis Why isn't it valid as "literally" here?

@vaartis s/tails/una/g (?)

(did you post that profile for some other reason?)

@vaartis "tails" is pronounced as "una"

@kunev @jerry @quad Basically, I don't think the concept of "violence" implies "any negative influence towards others", or if my definition is invalid, I only want to prohibit physical violence (with voluntary exceptions such as sado-masochism)

@kunev @jerry @quad See my previous reply - it's really not that hard of a topic.

@quad @jerry @kunev Well I personally believe all lives are inherently valuable as to the positive potential they hold for themselves, as well as others. You have a limited time with unlimited potential, don't just think of it as something that happens.

@kunev @jerry @quad lmao you're making it up a lot harder than it is. Freedom of expression is valid, but you should be exposed to the consequences as well (freedom to get criticized and opposed to). Must not be state-enforced. Environmental regulations seem to be necessary for fighting global effects of global warming, which sucks.

@kunev @jerry @quad (like, I get where you're coming from, but you seem to be implying that others' lives are only valuable as you consider them to be)

@kunev @jerry @quad " kind of hate that, cause I prefer to not think of other people's feelings and sentiments for everything I do."

Uhm... you sound like a sociopath tbh, you should consider that 🤔

@quad @jerry Welp, turns out it can be really important to make up your mind, know what all of the options are, better understand the world, and get off the irrational, polarized bipartisian fights.

I get it can get boring tho.

@quad @jerry These are the guys who are the closest at Norway BTW http://www.liberalistene.org/

@quad @jerry tfw get used to it lma :woah:

@quad @jerry I mean, it *is* that. Basically, "laissez-faire" economics literally mean "let do", "let go". A libertarian, minarchist governemnt tries to approach about that 95% of freedom you mentioned - the government has to be there to defend individual rights because we don't really know how to enforce them without a monopoly of force (a government), but it's the closest to anarchy that makes sense with what we know.