Notices by Xerz 💗 [UNMOVED] (espectalll@mstdn.io), page 86

@quad yes

Initial reactions after going full Musl :voidlinux:

It's great, amazing, but not for everyone. Musl does feel like an improvement, but right now there's too much broken stuff for many people to tolerate it I guess. Not like it constantly breaks, but that specific stuff doesn't work or you may even be lucky enough to find something that kernel panics.

@SEMI114514 which anime is this from? I know this gal(?) but I've never seen the actual series mentioned

@lain what an angelous voice may I say

@Sir_Boops It doesn't work like that, just fine-tune your filter settings

@lain you *really* are into the music memes

@Sir_Boops (in fact, don't uBlock Origin and uMatrix share a codebase)

@Sir_Boops ...but they're both for the same purpose...?

@Sir_Boops apparently I can only block all media (global setting, can change by page too) which exceeds a specific size. And guess what... it doesn't block Youtube embeds, neither shows up the URL of the blocked resource! So yeah... maybe I should switch to uMatrix :shrug_yui:

@Sir_Boops Oh that's pretty cool... can't I seriously do the same with uBlock Origin?

@Sir_Boops but it just blocks the whole thing, right?

(on a web browser I mean)

Hey, is there any way to block embedded media players and show up links to their original page instead?

@taiz yes

What can we learn form Channel Awesome? A nice video on the issues raised by the "Not So Awesome" thingie https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpcSLjBYYjs

I've just noticed how amazing my Twitter profile looks on Corebird

@Gargron From what I can quickly gather, this article is basing a prediction on science based on a non-scientific criteria of expecting greed/hype/ignorance/foolishness. That's simply not how it works, even if money is flowing largely in favor of AI due to those. In the past many things like this have been told for many current technlogies that were supposedly too good for us.

If the author can bring actual reasons on why is it going to fail, fine, but this just sounds like pandering.

@Gargron From what I can quickly gather, this article is basing a prediction on science based on a non-scientific criteria of expecting greed/hype/ignorance/foolishness. That's simply not how it works, even if money is flowing largely in favor of AI due to those. In the past many things like this have been told for many technlogies that were supposedly good too for us.

If the author can bring actual reasons on why is it going to fail, fine, but this just sounds like pandering.

@Gargron From what I can quickly gather, this article is basing a prediction on science based on a non-scientific criteria of expecting greed/hype/ignorance/foolishness. That's simply not how it works, even if money is flowing largely in favor of AI due to those. In the past many things like this have been told for many technlogies that were supposedly good for us.

If the author can bring actual reasons on why is it going to fail, fine, but this just sounds like pandering.