Notices by H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)
-
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Friday, 19-Oct-2018 21:56:14 UTC H. Faust
kelly_streaming.jpg -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Wednesday, 10-Oct-2018 14:35:59 UTC H. Faust Allow me to interject for a moment. What you're referring to as Attack on Titan, is in fact, Attack on Eoten, or as I've recently taken to calling it, The Eoten Onslaught. Attack on Titan is not a proper English phrase by the author, but rather a shitty translation by some editor's lackey that has no meaning in the proper English language and was probably translated by Google. The Eoten Onslaught is the proper translation for this Manga's Title, made useful by the hardworking translators at Commie, Webster's, Oxford and the Queen's Royal Palace.
Many weeaboos users read a modified version of the Eoten Onslaught manga every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of the Eoten Onslaught which is widely read today is often called Attack on Titan, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the the Eoten Onslaught, translated by Commie.
There really is a Attack on Titan, and these people are reading it, but it is just a shitty translation they use. Attack on Titan is engrish: a Japanese delinquent's attempt of speaking a language he was too stupid to understand while he was in highschool. This lackey is an essential part of an manga ecosystem, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete manga published. The lackey is normally used to get coffee or to draw backgrounds for the manga artist: the whole system is basically Attack on Eoten - a better, but not correct translation - or the Eoten Onslaught. All the so-called Attack on Titan distributions are really distributions of the Eoten Onslaught -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Tuesday, 11-Sep-2018 23:54:24 UTC H. Faust "He said that creating 90 second versions of anime opening and ending themes has become the standard for Japanese TV over the years, but this is not the case for international platforms and online streaming. In particular, Netflix cuts the ending themes short and automatically skips to the next episode"
cancel-netflix.png -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Thursday, 06-Sep-2018 04:47:57 UTC H. Faust @augustus EARTH HAS 4 CORNER
SIMULTANEOUS 4-DAY
TIME CUBE
WITHIN SINGLE ROTATION.
4 CORNER DAYS PROVES 1
DAY 1 GOD IS TAUGHT EVIL. -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Wednesday, 22-Aug-2018 19:39:40 UTC H. Faust I can already picture the """controversy""" in my mind, articles written by bloggers saying how this is the REAL anime and how great it is and those who hate are dumb, smelly bigots. -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Tuesday, 31-Jul-2018 02:13:13 UTC H. Faust
iceweasel-tan.jpg -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Saturday, 21-Jul-2018 04:40:24 UTC H. Faust Shichisei no Subaru - 03:
not-anohana.png -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Thursday, 07-Jun-2018 23:57:01 UTC H. Faust @deadsuperhero
>If you don't like it, you can fork it
>*Fork occurs*
>WTF! Stop dividing the Mastodon community! -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Monday, 04-Jun-2018 14:39:49 UTC H. Faust @lain When we call software “free,” we mean that it respects the users' essential freedoms: the freedom to run it, to study and change it, and to redistribute copies with or without changes. This is a matter of freedom, not price, so think of “free speech,” not “free beer.”
These freedoms are vitally important. They are essential, not just for the individual users' sake, but for society as a whole because they promote social solidarity—that is, sharing and cooperation. They become even more important as our culture and life activities are increasingly digitized. In a world of digital sounds, images, and words, free software becomes increasingly essential for freedom in general.
Tens of millions of people around the world now use free software; the public schools of some regions of India and Spain now teach all students to use the free GNU/Linux operating system. Most of these users, however, have never heard of the ethical reasons for which we developed this system and built the free software community, because nowadays this system and community are more often spoken of as “open source”, attributing them to a different philosophy in which these freedoms are hardly mentioned.
The free software movement has campaigned for computer users' freedom since 1983. In 1984 we launched the development of the free operating system GNU, so that we could avoid the nonfree operating systems that deny freedom to their users. During the 1980s, we developed most of the essential components of the system and designed the GNU General Public License (GNU GPL) to release them under—a license designed specifically to protect freedom for all users of a program.
Not all of the users and developers of free software agreed with the goals of the free software movement. In 1998, a part of the free software community splintered off and began campaigning in the name of “open source.” The term was originally proposed to avoid a possible misunderstanding of the term “free software,” but it soon became associated with philosophical views quite different from those of the free software movement.
Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same association.
The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a typical example.
For the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software.
“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any other name would give you the same freedom today, establishing freedom in a lasting way depends above all on teaching people to value freedom. If you want to help do this, it is essential to speak of “free software.”
We in the free software movement don't think of the open source camp as an enemy; the enemy is proprietary (nonfree) software. But we want people to know we stand for freedom, so we do not accept being mislabeled as open source supporters. -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Sunday, 20-May-2018 03:07:21 UTC H. Faust «Some versions of the Signal app have similar problems to those outlined in EFail. The answer to these problems, of course, is not "disable Signal." Rather it’s to ensure that you are running a patched, well-maintained version of an important security tool.» Finally someone pointed out this, everybody and their grandma were ready to dump PGP but when Signal got hit by two security vulnerabilities, it was dismissed as nothing new. -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Friday, 18-May-2018 01:59:43 UTC H. Faust In one week, two vulnerabilities has been found on Signal Desktop, but let's stop using PGP because someone bought a catchy domain. -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Tuesday, 15-May-2018 04:43:24 UTC H. Faust @guizzy
nendochad.jpg -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Saturday, 12-May-2018 02:05:30 UTC H. Faust >Use Electron for your desktop application
>Gets pwned
Oh Signal https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Desktop/issues/1635 | https://twitter.com/ortegaalfredo/status/995017143002509313 -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Monday, 07-May-2018 15:29:30 UTC H. Faust @hakui And so as the two counterparts go after one another, THEATRICS follows as it occurred that their feelings are better correspond it between them and began to examine the ESSENCE of ROMANCE. -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Wednesday, 02-May-2018 03:58:18 UTC H. Faust I point out to Discord but this applies to other platforms like Slack, Github and Cloudflare. -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Tuesday, 01-May-2018 22:42:37 UTC H. Faust Every time you hear that some video is produced specifically by Netflix, it is be appropriate to feel a wave of disgust and resentment. Those feelings will help you refuse to watch it — refuse to feed the monster. -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Tuesday, 01-May-2018 20:28:57 UTC H. Faust https://stallman.org/discord.html Good to know it's a page about Discord too. -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Tuesday, 01-May-2018 00:30:36 UTC H. Faust Mastodon social is down? Time to celebrate
weeu.webm -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Tuesday, 24-Apr-2018 20:16:37 UTC H. Faust "Every time you hear that some video is produced specifically by Netflix, it is be appropriate to feel a wave of disgust and resentment. Those feelings will help you refuse to watch it — refuse to feed the monster. " -
H. Faust (hfaust@pl.smuglo.li)'s status on Thursday, 19-Apr-2018 00:30:18 UTC H. Faust "Hai domo, Virtual Youtuber Kurisu Makisu-desu"
mpv-Steins Gate 0 - 02 720p-00-…