One of us backs up their claims with evidence, the other one says evidence is unnecessary and keeps repeating the word "FUD".
Notices by switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at), page 12
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 12:54:40 UTC switching.social -
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 12:51:25 UTC switching.social ...except that they're not, because ownership isn't the same as invention.
Geez, we're going round in circles here.
No point continuing unless you feel like backing up your claims with evidence.
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 12:49:24 UTC switching.social Your main argument was Tor was invented by the military, so that was somehow similar to Brave being owned by Thiel.
I pointed out they're not similar because the military doesn't own Tor.
You said Tor was still owned by the military.
I asked you for evidence of that.
You refused to give me any, then said you "don't actually think those things".
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 12:45:13 UTC switching.social You're accusing others of FUD, failing to provide any evidence, and now admitting you don't even believe your own posts?
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 12:43:15 UTC switching.social You're accusing others of FUD but then refusing to back up your own claims with any evidence?
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 12:39:12 UTC switching.social I provided evidence in my original post, why are you dodging my request for you to do the same?
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 12:17:44 UTC switching.social Hey, @torproject , does the US military own parts of TOR?
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 12:15:19 UTC switching.social Can you show me some evidence for that?
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 12:14:22 UTC switching.social You're confusing invention with ownership.
Does the US military own shares in TOR?
No.
Does Thiel own shares in Brave?
Yes.
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 11:34:59 UTC switching.social There's a free open federated network for storing and sharing music called Funkwhale:
You can follow them on here:
A really good example instance is open.audio, which is entirely Creative Commons tracks:
You can use it through the web, or through subsonic-compatible apps:
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 11:23:12 UTC switching.social If no one owns Brave, why does Brave have all those venture capital firms listed on the front page of its B2B site?
VC doesn't give people money for fun, they give it because they expect a return on their investment.
And "Facts be damned"...?
Could you name one single fact in my original post which is untrue?
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 11:16:57 UTC switching.social This isn't about who invented something, it's about ownership of its current form.
TOR was invented decades ago by the same organisation who invented the internet: US defense research. But both inventions grew beyond their original purposes, and the US didn't own them.
Brave continues to be part-owned by Thiel and other VCs.
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 10:53:06 UTC switching.social How many people do you think would use Brave if they all realised the head of Palantir and a Facebook board member is one of their owners?
Maybe it wouldn't matter to you, but a lot of privacy-minded people don't want to use a browser from such a company. That's why I'm trying to raise awareness of this issue.
-
Samuel Pepys (samuelpepys@mastodon.social)'s status on Monday, 02-Sep-2019 02:03:35 UTC Samuel Pepys Some of our maids sitting up late to get things ready against our feast to-day, Jane called us up to tell us of a great fire they saw in the City.
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Sunday, 01-Sep-2019 23:30:28 UTC switching.social Switching.social is aimed at non-technical people.
But if you are able to use uMatrix and find it more useful, that's great 👍
uMatrix is aimed at tech people, the first line of its description is "Definitely for advanced users."
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Sunday, 01-Sep-2019 23:13:25 UTC switching.social Switching.social is aimed at non-technical people.
uMatrix is aimed at tech people, the first line of its description is "Definitely for advanced users."
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Sunday, 01-Sep-2019 20:17:53 UTC switching.social That should work in theory, but as Google's Android etc show it doesn't always work in practice.
If Brave becomes widely used like Google Chrome is, then open source isn't enough to stop surveillance features being added (or adblockers being effectively banned from the browser).
And you have to wonder *why* a major anti-privacy figure like Thiel would be investing in a company that claims to be pro-privacy. Thiel is also on the board of Facebook, he is not to be trusted.
-
switching.social (switchingsocial@mastodon.at)'s status on Sunday, 01-Sep-2019 12:14:22 UTC switching.social Reminder why switching.social does NOT recommend using Brave:
-Brave is a for-profit ad sales and cryptocurrency promotion company, funded by venture capital firms. Its primary purpose is to make money, not protect privacy.
-Top of the list of Brave's VC owners is Founders Fund, which is Peter Thiel's company ( https://web.archive.org/web/20190831163230/https://basicattentiontoken.org/ )
-Peter Thiel is also the head of Palantir, which makes its money by spying on the general public ( https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2018-palantir-peter-thiel/ )
-
wallabag.org (wallabag@social.tcit.fr)'s status on Sunday, 01-Sep-2019 17:36:59 UTC wallabag.org In one week, we published three (3 !) beta versions for the next version of the Android :android: app.
Please help us by testing the app and looking for bugs 🐛 :
:google: through Google Play https://play.google.com/apps/testing/fr.gaulupeau.apps.InThePoche
:github: Download the APK on Github https://github.com/wallabag/android-app/releases
:f_droid: Unfortunately beta releases are currently not build by F-Droid. -
Krita (krita@mastodon.art)'s status on Sunday, 01-Sep-2019 05:24:13 UTC Krita Help beta test the new version! https://krita.org/en/item/help-beta-test-krita-4-2-6/