"The Algorithm". I'm sorry, but this is just embarrassing.
Conversation
Notices
-
muesli (fribbledom@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 31-Mar-2023 20:41:53 UTC muesli -
Swagpuss McG (swagpussc@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 31-Mar-2023 20:58:08 UTC Swagpuss McG @fribbledom
If author_is_elon
{
candidate=/=credible
}
Break
Loop
(Sorry I'm not a programmer lol)
@LittleSteps2B -
Emanuel Mendez (pielreloj@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 31-Mar-2023 21:08:05 UTC Emanuel Mendez @fribbledom I thought it was a joke but is it REAL??? π€―
-
vmarinelli (vmarinelli@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 31-Mar-2023 22:04:11 UTC vmarinelli @fribbledom Beyond cringe π¬
-
otherrealm (otherrealm@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 31-Mar-2023 23:03:07 UTC otherrealm @fribbledom "This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository." - Not on the main repository any more.
-
muesli (fribbledom@mastodon.social)'s status on Friday, 31-Mar-2023 23:04:09 UTC muesli Any more.
-
muesli (fribbledom@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 01-Apr-2023 00:23:50 UTC muesli That's the same file after they removed that part of the code.
-
Curioso π πΊπ¦ (jgg) (jgg@qoto.org)'s status on Saturday, 01-Apr-2023 00:23:51 UTC Curioso π πΊπ¦ (jgg) The real file is this: https://github.com/twitter/the-algorithm/blob/main/home-mixer/server/src/main/scala/com/twitter/home_mixer/functional_component/decorator/HomeTweetTypePredicates.scala
-
Mapler (d10d@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 01-Apr-2023 00:35:00 UTC Mapler @fribbledom Tf is this goofy shit
In conversation permalink -
muesli (fribbledom@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 01-Apr-2023 01:06:34 UTC muesli Yep, they wiped it from the branch's history, but not from the ref log.
In conversation permalink -
Icecream95 (ixn@mastodon.xyz)'s status on Saturday, 01-Apr-2023 01:06:35 UTC Icecream95 @fribbledom Now the page shows this:
"This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository."
But⦠on archive.org the first four snapshots don't have that message. Did the commit get force-pushed away?
In conversation permalink -
salomonderotti (salomonderotti@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 01-Apr-2023 09:03:56 UTC salomonderotti @fribbledom
Have you noticed the date when "the algorithm" was published?In conversation permalink -
muesli (fribbledom@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 01-Apr-2023 09:10:07 UTC muesli @salomonderotti Not April 1st.
In conversation permalink -
muesli (fribbledom@mastodon.social)'s status on Saturday, 01-Apr-2023 09:24:06 UTC muesli Nah, this isn't fake. It's been part of the original release, but they quickly wiped the branch's history.
In conversation permalink -
Tom Goldoin (tgoldoin@mastodon.tedomum.net)'s status on Saturday, 01-Apr-2023 09:25:02 UTC Tom Goldoin @d10d @fribbledom i know that you can "inject" fake commits by forking a github repo, adding a crafted commit to your fork, and then crafting a URL on the main repo with your specific commit hash. Due to internal details, Github will happily display your commit. So, without any additional proof, it seems to be more fake than real :-s
In conversation permalink
-