@stux What is going on? Can you clarify this whole Meta thing once and for all Stux?
Conversation
Notices
-
María Pérez :fedi: :Garf: (maperal@social.politicaconciencia.org)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Jun-2023 22:26:44 UTC María Pérez :fedi: :Garf: -
stux⚡ (stux@mstdn.social)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Jun-2023 22:26:45 UTC stux⚡ I want to apologize again for the sudden block from mstdn to .art💔
Some say it's because they where bashing on meta but that's untrue.
The admin was spreading mis information about the discussion that only fueled the fire and not the discussion with knowing any of the facts
If a "user" does this we can handle accordingly but when an admin does this it's getting worrisome
We should not figh each other but rather talk about it like adults, and also I am to blame in this
It won't happen again
Toni :mastodon: repeated this. -
María Pérez :fedi: :Garf: (maperal@social.politicaconciencia.org)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Jun-2023 22:36:24 UTC María Pérez :fedi: :Garf: @stux I don't actually understand what is happening. In just a few words, toots are "saying" some fedi admins held a meeting with Meta staff and "signed" a NDA. Is any of this true? What do you know?
-
María Pérez :fedi: :Garf: (maperal@social.politicaconciencia.org)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Jun-2023 23:20:50 UTC María Pérez :fedi: :Garf: @stux Ok, thanks! So, answering the questions based on this link:
1. Yes, there has been a contact, or even a meeting with Meta. This could had been done by email or even video conference ¿right?
2. Meta didn't ask for an NDA from these fedi admins ¿right? They just wanted to know "things" because they want to use the protocol ¿right?
Just making sure I'm understanding the posts. 🤓
-
stux⚡ (stux@mstdn.social)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Jun-2023 23:20:51 UTC stux⚡ @maperal Please see these posts :blobcathearts:
https://mstdn.social/@stux/110567524159195690 -
stux⚡ (stux@mstdn.social)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Jun-2023 23:24:27 UTC stux⚡ @maperal Sure thing :cat_hug_triangle:
1. Yes and yes haha! It would be indeed via digital channels since we're all over the world
2. Yes they did.. I guess because some info about their project is not public so an NDA is quite standard I guess 😉
In conversation permalink -
María Pérez :fedi: :Garf: (maperal@social.politicaconciencia.org)'s status on Tuesday, 20-Jun-2023 23:34:10 UTC María Pérez :fedi: :Garf: @stux
Ok. So what people are concerned about is the NDA.This has to do with the big fish eating the little ones, and I'm sure you understand this.
On the other side, since you were in the meeting (am i right?), you know about what can't be revealed. So, in this matter, and according to your own judgement, is this related to pure technical reasons, meaning, develpoment of software, infrastructure and such, so that (in appearence) won't hurt the community?
And I ask this, because since this is a HUGE company that will join the fediverse, it is important we all know about the implications and even if this is viable in a long term.
In conversation permalink -
stux⚡ (stux@mstdn.social)'s status on Wednesday, 21-Jun-2023 16:29:19 UTC stux⚡ Another thing I would like to adres is the death threats against mods and admins in the Fediverse
No matter what you oppion is about the meta discussion, this is not acceptable behaviour and it hurt so damn much
Please try to be civil about this so we can talk and discus this and keep the channels open
But please, stop with making death threats to people. It really has an impact
Let's talk
In conversation permalink
-