Conversation
Notices
-
*rolls eyes*
Mention the phrase 'broken condoms' once and 5000 puritans appear to 'splain to you how you don't understand birth control because *actually* it's a dichotomy and if a condom (that they don't even use because of "abstinence") isn't perfect it's automatically worthless, and there's no conceivable way anyone's one night stand couldn't demand birth controls that are fail secure.
Protection without overwrought quality controls enforcing the structural integrity? Must be heresy!
DIAF, the lot of you pathetic dullards.
-
@lain doesn't matter, OP can't see me anyway
-
@lain maybe they're just grateful their dad's protection failed
-
@lain i can be your angle...or yuor devil
-
well it would take exactly one troll cardinal in puritan-land to implement a puncturing needlepoint and disrespect it, and we'd be back here with "remember it's not true protection" posts. because at its core the true thing is that you can control who the condom goes into by locking your door and not approving partners from parties you don't trust. broken condoms don't travel into people you don't have sex with.
-
@roka @lain exactly~
-
@kro @roka @lain iunno, i'd have thought i was more of an obtuse angle
-
@kro @roka @lain stahp
-
@kro @roka @lain https://freezepeach.xyz/attachment/155646
-
@cow2001 which part
-
@cow2001 not exactly..
-
@nepfag i'm talking about how people try to justify their use of mastodon privacy settings^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hbroken condoms
-
@cow2001 i'm pretty sure some people here go out!
-
@shpuld @cow2001 are you telling me all those walks you went on were a lie??????
-
@shpuld @cow2001 you have a very big apartment
-
@shpuld @cow2001 christopher thomas "shp" knight
-
@miki @cow2001 exactly