Conversation

Notices

1. Ruby Rhod (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 23-Aug-2019 21:23:19 UTC Ruby Rhod

   • Ruby Rhod
   • tedu
   Ever since my Gun branch experiment which produced bad signatures I now can't see honks by @tedu but I do see people replying to him
   • Ruby Rhod (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 23-Aug-2019 22:18:31 UTC Ruby Rhod

     • jejune :abunhdhappy:
     • tedu
     @tedu @kaniini ugh yes looks like I am now victim of a new rate limiter
   • Ruby Rhod (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 23-Aug-2019 22:22:31 UTC Ruby Rhod

     • jejune :abunhdhappy:
     • tedu

     @kaniini @tedu which MR? Any of the rate limiting or a specific item?

     I’ve just set the following because I have no idea which ones of these is the bad one

     config :pleroma, :rate_limit,  search: [{1000, 10}, {1000, 30}],  app_account_creation: {1_800_000, 25},  relations_actions: nil,  relation_id_action: nil,  statuses_actions: nil,  status_id_action: nil,  password_reset: {1_800_000, 5},  account_confirmation_resend: {8_640_000, 5},  ap_routes: nil

   • Ruby Rhod (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 23-Aug-2019 22:44:08 UTC Ruby Rhod

     • jejune :abunhdhappy:
     • tedu
     @kaniini @tedu Varnish automatically adds X-Forwarded-For tho
   • Ruby Rhod (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Friday, 23-Aug-2019 22:49:16 UTC Ruby Rhod

     • jejune :abunhdhappy:
     • tedu
     @kaniini @tedu that real_ip module does because we have it in mfc fork and I thought it was upstream
   • Ruby Rhod (feld@bikeshed.party)'s status on Saturday, 24-Aug-2019 00:06:04 UTC Ruby Rhod

     • jejune :abunhdhappy:
     • tedu
     @kaniini @tedu yeah we needed it for sending correct source IP along with with request to our auth backend for rate limiting 😩
     
     Should have known to upstream that