IndieWeb (indieweb) group
-
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Thursday, 11-May-2017 05:30:05 UTC MMN-o ✅⃠ @waha06x36 @Gargron <a href="https://some.example/tags/microformats" rel="tag">verbose microformats category tag</a>
»Tags are embedded in HTTP URIs in a well-defined manner so that the tag embedded in an HTTP URI can be mechanically extracted from that URI. Specifically, the last segment of the path portion of the URI (after the final "/" character) contains the tag value.» - http://microformats.org/wiki/rel-tag
There you go. !ostatus doesn't require it, but HTML generated by !gnusocial aims to honour #microformats2 since it's great and makes us part of the !indieweb community. -
MMN-o ✅⃠ (mmn@social.umeahackerspace.se)'s status on Wednesday, 26-Apr-2017 10:07:14 UTC MMN-o ✅⃠ @herrabre That's exactly the idea of the spec methinks ;) (and even possibly email server configuratiom discovery though that's best solved with SRV records.
Google were, as you probably know, on the webfinger train when it started out. But bailed on it, as with everything else open and good.
webfinger -> profile page -> rel=me works pretty good today à la !indieweb with !GNUsocial at least. -
jas (jas@gnusocial.me)'s status on Saturday, 15-Apr-2017 10:49:29 UTC jas @stitchxd Just to clarify, I'm not thinking about leaving gnusocialme, just trying to look down the road. The bit I understand of !indieweb says that a person ought to own his own data. (I don't know how those two interact.) Seems, though, that's a goal consistent with !gnusocial and a worthy project. Of course, nobody's paid to do stuff around here, I understand that.
Here I am in my ignorance speaking of things I know little about. :)