Notices by nil (josemanuel@mastodon.tetaneutral.net@mastodon.tetaneutral.net), page 3

@roka I honestly find it hard to read the text.

@proxeus

@louis «These two notations may be used interchangeably as far as the Lisp system is concerned. However, as a matter of style, this book uses the notation () when it is desirable to emphasize the use of an empty list, and uses the notation nil when it is desirable to emphasize the use of the Boolean “false”.»

— Common Lisp, the Language. Guy L. Steele Jr.

Tell your friends the convention says: “Fuck you, idiots!”

@veer66

I was a subscriber to The New Yorker magazine for a year: I paid triple what an actual Newyorker would have, was not allowed to enter any contests and was not elligible for any promotions or discounts.

TNY also had the worst critics I have ever read in any publication. All of them were fucking idiots who knew next to nothing of the subject they were assigned to write about, be it movies, music, TV, and probably bars and restaurants, too.

The hardest temptation to get rid of is that of telling everybody about the good deed we've just done.

@noyoushutthefuckupdad «Look at the wonderful body of work that Frank Stack and Spain Rodriguez have created that's being ignored. Look at Joe Sacco's Palestine, it's only five hundred times better than Maus, but, strangely, Joe didn't even get nominated for a Pulitzer.»

— Harvey Pekar

@feld I guess I'll end up watching the episode this weekend.

@feld Well, the dude (and his crew) gotta live.

@feld An actual ad? Or did he just start rambling about it and happened to name a particular brand?

@feld I've never heard him talk about underwear, but I enjoyed both of his conversations with Tulsi and a few others I've seen, like how he unintentionally roasted Bari Weiss.

@diddledan That doesn't make her a bad example. This makes her a bad example: https://pleroma.libretux.com/objects/347843dc-090f-4ee4-9d97-0c7b83b0449a

@igeljaeger I sowwy too for stopping you from enjoying the moment and make you waste a minute of your time thinking about how a word is spelt.

@igeljaeger Well done.

@igeljaeger I hate to be That Guy, but I think you mean ‘bagpipers’ or just ‘pipers.’

@galipesc Of course I did. I didn't know what it was by the filename alone.

Then I realised that there are plenty of movies by actual geniuses like Murnau, which have not survived to this day (or are in pretty bad shape), and here I had some random ugly fuck's dick preserved for posterity. And that's when I decided to rm the fuck out of it.

I was cleaning up my computer and one of the things I found was a pornographic movie from the 1910s or 1920s. At first, I wondered: What the hell is this doing here? When did I download it?

I have no use for it and, to be honest, it was pretty much rubbish, so my fist impulse was to delete it, but I didn't want to act like a prude, so I stopped and asked myself whether it was possible that it had any redeeming value at all.

@demoakracia Seguramente esté mal visto decirlo, pero yo creo hay un efecto llamada. ¿Nunca os habéis fijado que los asesinatos machistas suelen venir de tres en tres?

De hecho, antes se hablaba de violadores igual que ahora (el del ascensor, el del Eixample, el de La Paz...), pero nunca de violaciones en grupo. Y estoy seguro de que habría sido noticia, igual que lo fue lo de Pamplona.

@colegota @rafapoverello

@mangel Pues no lo sé, pero la que hay es de 2018, y la de este año todavía la estarán haciendo. Yo la pasaba entre agosto y septiembre.

Pero por lo que estoy leyendo en el pdf, las CC.AA. también hacen algo parecido, así que seguramente lleves razón.

De todas formas, en ambos casos se trata de encuestas, así que nunca se saca el número exacto, lo cual es una lástima, porque no creo que cueste hacerlo y vendría fenomenal.

@mangel Pues sí es ésa, porque estoy viendo el cuestionario, y es el que yo pasaba a la base de datos. Si ves la página 11 del pdf (https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/estadistica/temas/estadisticas-agrarias/boletin2018_tcm30-504212.pdf) o la 7 del texto, verás que en la parte derecha del cuestionario pone “Rendimientos”. Eso es lo que los peritos a veces rellenaban y la mayoría no.

Un poco más adelante explican qué metodología seguían para hacerlo.

@mangel Te estoy hablando de los años 2006-2008. No sé cómo se hará ahora.

Pero, vamos, esos datos tienen que ser públicos. No había datos personales.

Te diría algo de Castilla y León, pero la verdad es que de lo único que me acuerdo es de que había mucha uva. (En número de parcelas. El rendimiento medio se me ha olvidado.)