Conversation

Notices

1. Hannes (hannes2peer@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2017 14:59:40 UTC Hannes

   • MMN-o ✅⃠
   • 馬鹿野狐(ばかやこ)✔
   • Eugen 💀
   • pettter ✅
   @mmn @pettter @takeshitakenji i think i agree with @gargron here. last time i checked, i remember thinking gs needed work on conversations
   • Hannes (hannes2peer@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2017 15:01:32 UTC Hannes

     in reply to

     • MMN-o ✅⃠
     • 馬鹿野狐(ばかやこ)✔
     • Eugen 💀
     • pettter ✅
     @mmn @pettter @takeshitakenji @gargron e.g. i think gs doesn't store the reply-to uri if the notice replied to doesn't exist locally (yet)
   • Hannes (hannes2peer@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2017 15:04:31 UTC Hannes

     in reply to

     • MMN-o ✅⃠
     • 馬鹿野狐(ばかやこ)✔
     • Eugen 💀
     • pettter ✅
     @mmn @pettter @takeshitakenji @gargron imo conversation_id in gnusocial is only a good idea if it speeds up db-stuff locally
   • Hannes (hannes2peer@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2017 15:11:09 UTC Hannes

     • MMN-o ✅⃠
     • Eugen 💀
     • pettter ✅
     @pettter ah, you are right. one-to-one relations is a problem when deleting notices. @mmn @gargron
   • RDN's Lucifer (nerthos@rainbowdash.net)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2017 15:12:13 UTC RDN's Lucifer

     in reply to
     @hannes2peer conversation_id is in place to prevent one of the most annoying things we had to deal with back in 2011 when most of the fediverse ran on statusnet: whenever someone deleted a post, the entire conversation tree would crumble and going into context would just show loose messages, or an individual post. It has a good reason to exist and should not be removed unless you want to go back 6 years in development. While it's not an issue for networks focused in ultra-casual, meaningless interaction, it's highly consequential for any node that values extensive and meaningful discussion, and for any implementation of GNUsocial in a work environment where easily following conversations is required.
     御園はくい likes this.
     御園はくい repeated this.
   • Hannes (hannes2peer@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2017 15:14:57 UTC Hannes

     • RDN's Lucifer
     @nerthos yes you are right, i wasn't thinking!
   • Hannes (hannes2peer@quitter.se)'s status on Monday, 13-Feb-2017 15:18:42 UTC Hannes

     • MMN-o ✅⃠
     • Eugen 💀
     • pettter ✅
     @pettter @mmn @gargron good point.